Planetary cycles, astrological theory of cycles of the markets

I searched a lot for these books, but I did not find them. Do you have the books to benefit from? Thank you very much

Hi, I`m new to this forum and i`m looking for an information about first trading dates of some commodities. I fount this useful site : https://www.cmegroup.com/media-room/...lturalProducts , but I`m still looking for historical first trading date for cocoa, coffee, sugar, cotton, wheat, orange juice. I need this information to make natal charts for this commodities.

There is really a simple way to use astrology that is very effective.

Buy when Moon is in Sagittarius when in uptrend (50 ma above 200 ma) and price has pulled back.

Sell when moon is in Gemini when in downtrend (50 ma below 200 ma) and price has pulled back.

That's it.

How to identify Vibration number.

Hi, I would like only to underline that astrology is not a science. It may be something else, but not a science. It is a belief but there is not any evidence that it works.

Besides, the Zodiac is incorrect. The concept of the precession of the equinoxes can be used to demonstrate that the zodiacal constellations as traditionally defined in astrology are no longer in alignment with the actual positions of the constellations in the sky. Here's how this works:

1. Traditional Zodiacal Dates: In astrology, each of the twelve signs of the zodiac is associated with a specific range of dates. For example, Aries is typically associated with March 21st to April 19th, and Taurus with April 20th to May 20th, and so on.
2. Precession's Impact: As explained earlier, due to the precession of the equinoxes, the position of the vernal equinox, which marks the beginning of spring, is gradually shifting backward along the ecliptic. This means that the constellations that were traditionally associated with the signs of the zodiac in ancient times are no longer in the same positions in the sky as they were when astrology was developed.
3. Shift in Constellations: Over the course of thousands of years, this precessional shift has caused a misalignment between the zodiacal signs and the actual constellations in the sky. In other words, if you were born on a date that astrology associates with a particular zodiac sign (e.g., Aries), the Sun would not be in the Aries constellation in the modern sky; it would be in the constellation adjacent to it due to the precession.
4. Example: Let's take the case of Aries. In ancient times, around 2,000 years ago, the vernal equinox was indeed in the Aries constellation, which is why it was associated with that sign. However, due to precession, the vernal equinox has shifted into the constellation of Pisces in the modern era.

So, in the modern sky, when astrologers say the Sun is in Aries, it is, in fact, in the constellation of Pisces. This misalignment demonstrates that the traditional zodiacal constellations used in astrology do not accurately reflect the current positions of the constellations in the sky.

Let's take the example of the traditional sign of Taurus now.

1. Traditional Zodiac Dates:

1. In astrology, Taurus is typically associated with the date range of April 20th to May 20th.

2. Precession of the Equinoxes:

1. As previously mentioned, the precession of the equinoxes causes a gradual shift in the position of the vernal equinox along the ecliptic.

3. Calculating the Shift:

1. We can calculate the angular shift in the position of the vernal equinox corresponding to the time interval between the ancient reference date and a modern date associated with Taurus (e.g., April 20th).

4. Formula for Angular Shift (Δθ):

1. Δθ = Ω * t

Where:

1. Δθ is the change in the tilt of the Earth's equator.
2. Ω is the angular precession rate (approximately 50.29 arcseconds per year).
3. t is the time elapsed in years.

5. Calculation for Taurus (April 20th):

1. Let's assume we want to find the position of Taurus on April 20th, 2023 (a modern date).
2. First, calculate the time elapsed (t) since the ancient reference date (around 2,000 years ago). We'll use the midpoint of the date range for Taurus, which is May 5th (approximately).
3. t = 2023 (current year) - (2000 years ago + 5/365 years) ≈ 2023 - 5/365 ≈ 2023 - 0.0137 ≈ 2022.9863 years.
4. Now, use the formula to calculate the angular shift:
5. Δθ = 50.29 arcseconds/year * 2022.9863 years ≈ 101,722.06 arcseconds.

6. Conversion to Degrees:

1. To convert arcseconds to degrees, divide by 3600 (since there are 3600 arcseconds in one degree).
2. Δθ ≈ 101,722.06 arcseconds / 3600 ≈ 28.25 degrees.

So, due to the precession of the equinoxes over the last approximately 2,000 years, the vernal equinox has shifted backward by approximately 28.25 degrees along the ecliptic. This means that the constellation of Taurus, as traditionally defined in astrology, would no longer align with the Sun on April 20th. Instead, the Sun would be in a different constellation, approximately 28.25 degrees ahead of Taurus in the modern sky. This demonstrates the misalignment between the traditional zodiacal signs and the actual positions of the constellations in the sky due to precession. Traditionally, Taurus follows Aries in the zodiac. So, the constellation immediately ahead of Taurus is Gemini. Therefore, on April 20th in the modern sky, the Sun would be in the constellation of Gemini rather than Taurus, due to the precession of the equinoxes.

So, it is obvious that Astrology does not have a basis and that, before, astrologists should answer these questions:

1. Is there an undiscovered force or mechanism responsible for astrology's effects?

1. Does an unknown force exist that connects celestial bodies to human behavior and personality traits in a way that astrology suggests?

2. How are celestial bodies connected to this hypothetical force?

1. What is the nature of the relationship between the positions and movements of celestial bodies (e.g., planets, stars) and the proposed force that influences human traits and experiences?

3. Can this force influence human behavior, personality, and life events?

1. Is this hypothetical force capable of exerting an influence on human behavior, shaping personality traits, and impacting life events?

4. Are the effects of this force observable and measurable?

1. If this force exists, can its effects be observed and quantified in terms of individual characteristics and broader societal trends?

5. Does this force possess predictive power?

1. Does the proposed force have the ability to make accurate predictions about individuals' lives based on the positions of celestial bodies?

6. What specific testable predictions does this hypothesis generate?

1. Are there specific, testable predictions that can be derived from this hypothesis, which can be investigated through controlled experiments or observational studies?

7. How does this hypothesis reconcile with established scientific principles?

1. How does the hypothesis align with the principles of physics, biology, psychology, and other scientific disciplines? Does it respect and explain established scientific knowledge?

8. Why haven't astrological predictions consistently demonstrated empirical validity?

1. Given the existence of this proposed force, why have scientific studies not consistently found empirical evidence supporting astrological claims?

And this is my humble opinion about astrology and would like to warn those who were new to it that it is considered a belief, not anything that has a specific purpose beyond enterntainment if you wish.

I hugely admire your maths skills and reasoning but for genuine answers I found deductive reasoning is way more useful, otherwise you end up spending your life proving stuff wrong that's obviously hokey to start with -Mars entering Uranus etc. Same with vast swathes of TA which started out as predictive science (yes science, not fluff) but is now commonly used a way of telling a story about what just happened.

I believe in the wisdom of crowds to look in the right direction, but the madness of crowds that they see most things upside down. I also believe astrology came about to try and explain known patterns in group behaviour not the other way around. Whether or not it's planetary influence or something different is immaterial, at the end of the day it either holds up to mathematical scrutiny or not.

My strategy is pretty much down pat now so I'm not tearing my hair out looking for the next best thing. But if I was looking at the market in terms of periodicity, I'd start here: https://noc.ac.uk/files/documents/bu.../Tides-FAQ.pdf

If your strategy works for you, then, of course ignore everything anyone, including me, think and say of it. I do it, in fact when people that know shit about what I do try to mock or make fun of my techniques without even understanding or asking what I do beforehand.

On the other side, yes, I know the tides, and why they happen and how gravity works in general and the type of force is. I really appreciate your kindness and your link. It is also worth mentioning that gravity is not the forces related to astrology, just saying in case it would be of your interest.

Regarding periodicity, I already was lucky to have an opporunity to study it for a lot of years from many perspectives, from basic to advanced statistics, using signal analysis methods that study wave frequency, or simply understanding human behavior within different time scales, etc...

I only wanted to highlight, in my previous post, that the author of the thread said that astrology is a science, and it is not. There is no one study that relates the zodiac with human behavior. It is purely a personal belief. I just wanted to give a little formal demonstration of what I was saying using a bit of Astronomy maths.

Said that, I am not saying your system is wrong at all, please do not understand it. I wanted to talk about astrology only, because I have seen during my life how pseudo-science is dangerous for people when it is not used as pure enterntainment. But it should not be like that for everyone, of course.

Ha yes, that's cool I think I missed 10 lines of explanation there - for sure I knew you'd know about tides,gravational pull etc, there's no way you'd be knocking out high-level maths like that without knowing.

What I meant was if something's believed by many but doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny there's usually wisdom in it, buried deep beneath the surface. Like candlesticks, possibly the greatest hoodwink in financial history. In my experience at any rate, this third path is where everything profitable in trading lies.
Anyway no disagreement from me, pseudoscience it is, but there's useful principles in it.

Yes, I get your point. Thank you for sharing your ideas and experience.

Cheers.

Lol.

This is the funniest thread I've seen on FF.

A warning to beginners. Don't try or waste any of your time on any of this lunacy.

Yeah man, but they attached the meaning of aries, to the meaning of the initiation of the spring, so all Aries qualities represent new beggining, vigor energy, etc... you are right in the beggining of the spring on the north hemisphere there is no more the Aries constellation, but its still the beggining of the Spring so those days still represent the same "Aries" energy. We could say the same for all simbols.