Fibonacci levels do work. That's why so many people use them. Even if they are self fulfilling, fact is it worked to begin with (which was why people started using it). Maybe the author is drawing them back to front?
Also worth noting it's not an indicator as such but an analytical tool - but from what I've seen it is a lot more reliable than many/most indicators. 61.8 and 78.6 reversals occur all the time (50% too, but that is not derived from Fibonacci sequence).
USDCAD topped at the 78.6 of the multiyear range in February - Fibonacci PA traders were predicting a top there one month prior. They were spot on. Simple as that.
Just hindsight? This guy has done some blogs for Vantage FX in the past but this call was on his Tradingview weeks before the top: 'Monthly close above 61.8 Targets 78.6' https://www.tradingview.com/chart/US...s-78-6-1-4660/
Also worth noting it's not an indicator as such but an analytical tool - but from what I've seen it is a lot more reliable than many/most indicators. 61.8 and 78.6 reversals occur all the time (50% too, but that is not derived from Fibonacci sequence).
USDCAD topped at the 78.6 of the multiyear range in February - Fibonacci PA traders were predicting a top there one month prior. They were spot on. Simple as that.
Just hindsight? This guy has done some blogs for Vantage FX in the past but this call was on his Tradingview weeks before the top: 'Monthly close above 61.8 Targets 78.6' https://www.tradingview.com/chart/US...s-78-6-1-4660/