If you read my post, you will see I explain the following
"You'd assume as the empirical evidence of his own methods, he should have been reasonably successful as a trader but this does not seem to be the case as for most of his career he has either been a losing trader or a trading coach and he explains this clearly in his book"
I then summarised the preface to explain this opinion, I suggest you re-read it to save me posting it again.
Just for the record.
"You'd assume as the empirical evidence of his own methods, he should have been reasonably successful as a trader but this does not seem to be the case as for most of his career he has either been a losing trader or a trading coach and he explains this clearly in his book"
I then summarised the preface to explain this opinion, I suggest you re-read it to save me posting it again.
Just for the record.
Disliked{quote} So you have nothing to back up your assertion that he's a failed trader then. Just for the record.Ignored